Real-Time Medical Utilization & Provider Collaboration Platform

Authors

  • Ethan Williams Author
    Competing Interests

    AI,ML

Keywords:

Resilience. Real-time inference. Data lifecycle. Data provenance, quality, and security. Provider collaboration. Interoperability standards.

Abstract

Research assesses resilience in real-time inference for medical utilization and provider collaboration through an original insight architecture. Derived from seminal frameworks, crucial design considerations and applied perspectives bolster fault tolerance, data management efficiency, and cross-organization interaction within an operational setting's decision-making zone, enhancing patient care, operational performance, and resource equity. Specifically, the central structure supports governance and management of analytic processes, forming a cohesive Ecosystem Affordance Architecture that encompasses data-provisioning, utilization-analytics, and analytic-execution interactions. Automation and insight delivery are augmented through data-engineering pipelines, with complemented services for capacity alignment, anomaly detection, scenario testing, and utilization access equity. Concrete implementation requirements are suggested.

Operational management and future planning of real-time utilization adjustable within the medical setting—being use case, and method of analysis—constitute the key research thrust. Concurrent utilization of major providers engaged within the longitudinal forward cycle—consisting of ingestion, analytic, and execution instances—prompts the replicated architecture investigation in line with historical strengthening and adjustment drivers. Specific applied-concept reinforcement prioritizes examination of service level or commitment—streams or batches—and integrity of perceived service. Acknowledged, simpler preconditions are suspended—support engineering, support-engineering pipelines, support-analytic pipelines, internal-analytic pipelines, and production tracing—and hence also the earlier statistical estimation of resource characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Albertson, E. M., Chuang, E., O'Masta, B., Miake-Lye, I., Haley, L. A., & Pourat, N. (2022). Systematic review of care coordination interventions linking health and social services for high-utilizing patient populations. Population Health Management, 25(1), 73–85.

2. Andrade, A., Calabretto, J., Pratt, N., Kalisch-Ellett, L., Le Blanc, V., & Roughead, E. (2023). Precision public-health intervention for care coordination: A real-world study. British Journal of General Practice, 73(728), e220–e227.

3. Yandamuri, U. S. (2023). An Intelligent Analytics Framework Combining Big Data and Machine Learning for Business Forecasting. International Journal Of Finance, 36(6), 682-706.

4. Chute, C., French, T., Raman, S., & Bradley, J. (2022). User requirements for comanaged digital health and care: Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(6), e35337.

5. Duan-Porter, W., Ullman, K., Majeski, B., Miake-Lye, I., Diem, S., & Wilt, T. J. (2022). Care coordination models and tools—Systematic review and key informant interviews. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(6), 1367–1379.

6. Fjellså, H. M. H., Husebø, A. M. L., & Storm, M. (2022). eHealth in care coordination for older adults living at home: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(10), e39584.

7. Harahap, N. C., Handayani, P. W., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2021). Functionalities and issues in the implementation of personal health records: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(7), e26236.

8. Kolla, S. K., & Reddy, V. A. R. (2023). Deep Learning Architectures For Multimodal Medical Data Integration. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 248–260.

9. Hayes, C. J., Dawson, L., McCoy, H., Hernandez, M., Andersen, J., Ali, M. M., Bogulski, C. A., & Eswaran, H. (2023). Utilization of remote patient monitoring within the United States health care system: A scoping review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 29(3), 384–394.

10. Ibrahim, M. S., Yusoff, H. M., Abu Bakar, Y. I., Aung, M. M. T., Abas, M. I., & Ramli, R. A. (2022). Digital health for quality healthcare: A systematic mapping of review studies. Digital Health, 8, 20552076221085810.

11. Li, E., Clarke, J., Ashrafian, H., Darzi, A., & Neves, A. L. (2022). The impact of electronic health record interoperability on safety and quality of care in high-income countries: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(9), e38144.

12. McGuier, E. A., Kolko, D. J., Aarons, G. A., Schachter, A., & Klem, M. L. (2024). Teamwork and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 19, 49.

13. Norton, J. M., Ip, A., Ruggiano, N., Abidogun, T., Camara, D. S., Fu, H., Hose, B.-Z., Miran, S., Hsiao, C.-J., Wang, J., & Bierman, A. S. (2022). Assessing progress toward the vision of a comprehensive, shared electronic care plan: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(6), e35277.

14. Palmieri Serrano, L., Maita, K. C., Avila, F. R., Torres-Guzman, R. A., Garcia, J. P., Eldaly, A. S., Haider, C. R., Felton, C. L., Paulson, M. R., Maniaci, M. J., & Forte, A. J. (2023). Benefits and challenges of remote patient monitoring as perceived by health care practitioners: A systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 27(4), 100–111.

15. Reindl-Spanner, P., Prommegger, B., Gensichen, J., & Krcmar, H. (2022). Insights on patient-generated health data in healthcare: A literature review. PACIS 2022 Proceedings, 26.

16. Bandi, V. D. V. K. (2023, November). Production-Grade Machine Learning Pipelines For Healthcare Predictive Analytics. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 189–205.

17. Torab-Miandoab, A., Samad-Soltani, T., Jodati, A., & Rezaei-Hachesu, P. (2023). Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: A systematic literature review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23, 18.

18. Vance, A. J., Benjamin, A., Hsu, J., & Berry, J. G. (2023). Care coordination programs for infants with complex conditions: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 152(1), e2022061083.

19. Vorisek, C. N., Lehne, M., Klopfenstein, S. A. I., Mayer, P. J., Bartschke, A., Haese, T., & Thun, S. (2022). Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) for interoperability in health research: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(7), e35724.

20. Willis, V. C., Thomas Craig, K. J., Jabbarpour, Y., Scheufele, E. L., Arriaga, Y. E., Ajinkya, M., Rhee, K. B., & Bazemore, A. (2022). Digital health interventions to enhance prevention in primary care: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(1), e33518.

21. Lehne, M., Sass, J., Essenwanger, A., Schepers, J., & Thun, S. (2019). Why digital medicine depends on interoperability. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2, 79.

22. Lehne, M., Luijten, S., & Thun, S. (2022). The role of interoperability in digital health ecosystems. Digital Health, 8, 20552076221113470.

23. Kolla, S. H. (2023). Large Language Model-Driven Enterprise Service Intelligence for Digital Workflow Transformation. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 6(1), 8380-8391.

24. Farias, M. A., et al. (2022). Developing a shared sepsis data infrastructure: A systematic review and concept map to FHIR. NPJ Digital Medicine, 5, 44.

25. Kuhn, T., & Giuse, D. A. (2021). From hospital information systems to digital health ecosystems: Interoperability and data integration challenges. Journal of Medical Systems, 45, 100.

26. Kourouklis, G., et al. (2021). The Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard: Systematic literature review of implementations, applications, challenges and opportunities. JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(7), e21929.

27. Albertson, E. M., Chuang, E., O'Masta, B., Miake-Lye, I., Haley, L. A., & Pourat, N. (2021). Care coordination interventions for high-utilizing patient populations: A systematic review. Population Health Management, 25(1), 73–85.

28. Hunsbedt Fjellså, H. M., Husebø, A. M. L., & Storm, M. (2022). eHealth technologies supporting care coordination and continuity for older adults: A scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(10), e39584.

29. Gour, S., Peake, A., Tong, C., Churm, J., Ahmad, B., Pournik, O., & Arvanitis, T. N. (2024). Advancing healthcare through interoperability: Implementing scalable solutions for patient data integration. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 316, 151–155.

30. González, Z., et al. (2024). Semantic interoperability for an AI-based applications platform for smart hospitals using HL7 FHIR. Journal of Systems and Software, 215, 112093.

31. Li, E., Clarke, J., Ashrafian, H., Darzi, A., & Neves, A. L. (2022). Electronic health record interoperability and its effects on patient safety and quality of care: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(9), e38144.

32. Sivaraman, V., et al. (2024). Digital information ecosystems in modern care coordination and patient care pathways and the challenges and opportunities for AI solutions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e60258.

33. Mangalampalli, B. M. Generative AI Applications In Healthcare Data Mart Design And Optimization.

34. Meskó, B., Görög, M., & others. (2024). Digital health technologies and artificial intelligence in healthcare: Interoperability, clinical integration, and patient-centered care. Digital Health, 10, 2055207624.

35. Meyer, A. N. D., Giardina, T. D., Spitzmueller, C., Shahid, U., Scott, T. M., & Singh, H. (2024). Patient safety and the digital transformation of healthcare: Health information exchange, interoperability, and clinical decision support. BMJ Quality & Safety, 33, 1–10.

Additional Files

Published

2024-03-17

Data Availability Statement

None

How to Cite

Real-Time Medical Utilization & Provider Collaboration Platform. (2024). Global Research Development(GRD), 2(01). https://grdjournals.org/index.php/grd/article/view/26

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

11-20 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.